I now use VB6 to software development, sometimes need to do dynamic library, you need to use DELPHI6, but DELPHI6 used was born, but I meant to make a long-term development, microcontroller development using C, but this one I haven't involved,

There is a problem now is that if considering the software design of this piece, in 2016, Google's operating system will be more than Microsoft, this involves a cross-platform issues (WINDOWS, apple's IOS, MAC OS, Google android, CHARM), and make the most use C,

Cross-platform development, I know, in addition to QT, DELPHI and c + + BUILDER,

I now preliminary from VB6 to c + + BUILDER, please help me to analyze, this choice is good,

Thank you for your attention

CodePudding user response:

You have already analysis is very good, practical.
In fact, all roads lead to Rome, suits own is good.
Good shoes, only the feet know others have no way to make guidance for you.

CodePudding user response:

reference 1st floor xabcxyz response:

you have is very good, the analysis of the feasible.
In fact, all roads lead to Rome, suits own is good.
Good shoes, only the feet know others have no way to make guidance for you.

I want to know the DELPHI and c + + BUILDER now are there any signs of recovery, now the market is very small!

CodePudding user response:

If choose between c + + Builder and Delphi, advice or choose c + + Builder, after all is a c + +, portability is better than PASCAL many

CodePudding user response:

Cb if using VCL then don't talk about what transplant, but without the VCL is not necessary to use the cb, also is a kind of struggle,
But on future cross-platform Embarcadero Delphi support obviously better than cb,
Want me to say, want to go with Embarcadero cb and Delphi synchronous learning, of course, if you don't have the money didn't idle, or diverted, Delphi's market is very small, cb market is smaller than the Delphi,

CodePudding user response:

If it's for the sake of their jobs, don't go Embarcadero this wooden bridge, should follow the market,
Learning this stuff, power is your job or interest, to balance your job and interest in nature is good, can't choose their jobs give attention to two or morethings,

CodePudding user response:

Didn't understand what you say

CodePudding user response:

reference 4 floor sololie response:

cb if using VCL then don't talk about what transplant, but without the VCL is not necessary to use the cb, also is a kind of struggle,
But on future cross-platform Embarcadero Delphi support obviously better than cb,
Want me to say, want to go with Embarcadero cb and Delphi synchronous learning, of course, if you don't have the money didn't idle, or diverted, Delphi's market is very small, cb market is smaller than the Delphi,

That if use MFC in c + +, not to also can not talk about transplantation?

CodePudding user response:

reference 5 floor sololie reply:

if it is for the sake of their jobs, don't go Embarcadero this wooden bridge, should follow the market,
Learning this stuff, power is your job or interest, to balance your job and interest in nature is good, can't choose their jobs, give attention to two or morethings

According to the forecast of the android operating system market share will be more than 2016 Microsoft, cross-platform software development will become the big trend, cross-platform development of DELPHI and c + + BUILDER should soon in nearly 122 years, recovery,

CodePudding user response:

BCB and learn with Delphi

CodePudding user response:

Learn what seems to be no rules...

CodePudding user response:

To learn a, two is about the same, to in-depth study, each have each characteristic,
When I was learning to use CB3, then made the software D6,

CodePudding user response:

Support learning c + + builder

CodePudding user response:

Thank you, welcome other friends,

CodePudding user response:

Make the bottom is the C and assembly, the uncontroversial,
Application software development decisive c + +, MFC, do not have to learn, has eliminated
I'm bullish on Qt

Prospect of Delphi and CB urge you to give it up, dark, less data, basic no books, technology lag
I'm from Delphi to c + +/Qt

CodePudding user response:

MFC is too old, in addition to the qt cross-platform, also didn't find where is very advanced,
You go to Java \ objective - c

CodePudding user response:

Better c + + 1

CodePudding user response:

On the 14th floor aqtata

reference response:

make bottom is the C and assembly, the uncontroversial,
Application software development decisive c + +, MFC, do not have to learn, has eliminated
I'm bullish on Qt

Prospect of Delphi and CB urge you to give it up, dark, less data, basic no books, technology lag
I'm from Delphi to c + +/Qt

Could you tell me you say c + +, MFC, do not have to learn, learn what types of c + + development tools?

In 2016, Google's operating system will be more than Microsoft, the situation will soon have to change it

CodePudding user response:

refer to 17th floor jinsanpan response:

reference 14 floor aqtata reply:
Make the bottom is the C and assembly, the uncontroversial,
Application software development decisive c + +, MFC, do not have to learn, has eliminated
I'm bullish on Qt

Prospect of Delphi and CB urge you to give it up, dark, less data, basic no books, technology lag
I'm from Delphi to c + +/Qt
Could you tell me you say c + +, MFC, do not have to learn, learn what types of c + + development tools?

In 2016, Google's operating system will be more than Microsoft, the situation should be...

actually use c + + development tools is not much, if you are interested in, can learn MFC, learn the other tools quickly

CodePudding user response:

refer to 17th floor jinsanpan response:

on the 14th floor aqtata reply: reference to the underlying is C and assembly, the uncontroversial,
Application software development decisive c + +, MFC, do not have to learn, has eliminated
I'm bullish on Qt

Prospect of Delphi and CB urge you to give it up, dark, less data, basic no books, technology lag
I'm from Delphi to c + +/Qt
Could you tell me you say c + +, MFC, do not have to learn, learn what types of c + + development tools?

In 2016, Google's operating system...

In 2016, more than Microsoft, Google system,, you are too optimistic...
I think this is not a problem you want to consider,
Learn things too much, c + + STL ATL WTL to see their own interests, direction,
I think Qt is good, mainly because it design the UI is very strong, and the latest version to support android and ios,

Languages are figured out, you have learned, the other is easy

CodePudding user response:

If project general difficulty to request, c + + builder development is very rapid

CodePudding user response:

references the 19th floor aqtata response:

refer to 17th floor jinsanpan response:
On the 14th floor aqtata reply: reference to the bottom is the C and assembly, the uncontroversial,
Application software development decisive c + +, MFC, do not have to learn, has eliminated
I'm bullish on Qt

Prospect of Delphi and CB urge you to give it up, dark, less data, basic no books, technology lag
I'm from Delphi to c + +/Qt
Could you tell me you say c + +, MFC, do not have to learn, learn what types of c + + development tools?

There are 20...

Sometimes I need to develop a dynamic link library, not the driver, QT to develop this kind of dynamic library?
And QT class a good book, please recommend several books, thank you very much,

CodePudding user response:

nullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnullnull