More than ten year useless CB and fetch, will only use CB6, do how?

CodePudding user response:

Cool do!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

CodePudding user response:

Used 6 and 2010, it is not about, high version IDE seems to have no localization patch,

CodePudding user response:

Use! The classic c + + Builder!

CodePudding user response:

Miss BCB6

CodePudding user response:

Only pregnant!!!!!!!!!!

CodePudding user response:

I know a Daniel, until now still use CB5.0, silk Howe does not affect him to write excellent remote control applications,

CodePudding user response:

Ah, in Berlin the new version, don't want to use the old,

CodePudding user response:

A little nostalgic can also, don't make large new projects development, overall very troublesome, and amateur can play

CodePudding user response:

Mo, you can also JAVA and c #

CodePudding user response:

Learned QT is no longer the BCB

CodePudding user response:

Have been use cb6

Next small project, whatever it takes to Berlin the

Yesterday was criticized the moderators, modesty, boxed in

Is actually lost the passion of learning something new and motivation

CodePudding user response:

The company also USES before, now in c #, eliminated

CodePudding user response:

The company has been used in 6

CodePudding user response:

CB has been using

CodePudding user response:

I know a Daniel, until now still use CB5.0, silk Howe does not affect him to write excellent remote control applications,

@ ccrun, that he developed under the Windows 7? Or under the xp development?

CodePudding user response:

CB6.0 or with someone, although I don't have to for many years, but 6.0 work well,

CodePudding user response:

If it is a new development, or in the new version of the good

CodePudding user response:

Is the namespace System which in the header file builder6.0?

CodePudding user response:

I still use cb5

CodePudding user response:

Still in use, and in the use of vc + + 6.0, the is the classic of classics, quite good, does not occupy a space

CodePudding user response:

C + + builder is a high efficiency, requires little programming tools

CodePudding user response:

Mobile development or XE version

CodePudding user response:

Now, I still use CB6 2004 CB10.2 major is industrial engineering. Good interface. To save time.

CodePudding user response:

refer to the original poster THP response:

not used CB for more than 10 years, and fetch, will only use CB6, do how?

give it up

CodePudding user response:

Cb6 classic tools, praise,

CodePudding user response:

BBS integral to how to make now? Don't think everything next integral, just want to charge? Good poor,

CodePudding user response:

BCB6 editor function is too weak, if you can write code on the latest editor (such as v code), then the command-line compiler?

CodePudding user response:

luomh98 reference 27 reply:

BCB6 editor function is too weak, if you can write code on the new editor (such as v code), then the command-line compiler?

Not reality, such as 10.4 x version have Visual Assist code, tips,

CodePudding user response:

C + + builder6 has been sealed for more than a decade

CodePudding user response:

Bcb6 installation package is still there, also in 2010, also install the delphi7, ha ha,, basic need not

CodePudding user response:

I have been also made small desktop tool cb6, a more formal project recently, is to be a wireless module of PC software,

CodePudding user response:

reference 15 floor junie0909 response:

I know a Daniel, until now still use CB5.0, silk Howe does not affect him to write excellent remote control applications,

@ ccrun, that he developed under the Windows 7? Or under the xp development?

A program written in 32-bit Windows 7, can be in 64 win10 under normal operation,